Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
TetraWiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Training 2022 Linux team/
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Training session Tetra team on TATAELECTRONICS ZIMBRA DLP understanding. Dated 07 Nov 2022 - Tetra Support Staff - Biswajit Banerjee== {{#ev:youtube|9RTHkBx6EXc|640}} '''Video summary:''' [PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT - substantial silent/music gaps throughout] "Training session Tetra team on TATAELECTRONICS ZIMBRA DLP understanding" -- an architecture and scope-boundary session for Tata Electronics' Zimbra environment, with a strong emphasis on clarifying what is and isn't Tetra's responsibility. The presenter is explicit that writing or modifying DLP (Data Loss Prevention) policy content itself is out of scope for the team -- that's owned by Amit's team -- and pushes back on the idea of guessing at policy configuration via "Google search," stressing the team should understand and support the environment, not experiment on it. Describes Tata Electronics' architecture: a single Zimbra instance hosted as a VM (likely on VMware), not exposed to the internet and reachable only over a client-controlled secure internal network limited to factory staff -- noted as having diminishing relevance since most day-to-day work is handled through other channels. Covers the DLP solution running on top as a 4-point (or similarly-tiered) Boldon/BB-type add-on, and briefly reviews what a DLP policy conceptually is at a high level. Later in the session, introduces an "FSM" (Affiliate/Field Service Management-type) server and a secondary/primary routing concept relevant to escalation paths. A trainee's live question about whether DRBD-style replication could be reused for a different context ("YouSecure") prompts the presenter to caution that DRBD is a genuinely complex technology that shouldn't be reached for by default, and that NFS, while simpler, is meaningfully slower than proper SAN-based storage -- a reminder that infrastructure choices should match the actual requirement rather than defaulting to what's familiar. Session closes with an unresolved escalation waiting on confirmation from another team member (Yogesh) before the topic can be closed out.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to TetraWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
TetraWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)