Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
TetraWiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Training 2022 Linux team/
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Training session on Nagios Alert 07 Feb 2023 - Tetra Support Staff - Alok== {{#ev:youtube|J56PqqvexAI|640}} '''Video summary:''' "Training session on Nagios Alert Tetra Support Staff Alok" -- a focused session on the judgment call behind mail-queue-growth alerts specifically: when a queue-size warning fires but the support engineer on shift doesn't have credentials to log into that particular mail server, the correct move is NOT to guess whether it's normal or a problem -- it's to call the engineer who does have access and ask them to check the actual mail contents. Uses Hero MotoCorp as the running example: it has 3000+ dealer/account recipients, so any single outbound campaign naturally spikes the queue as it fans out to all of them, making a growing queue completely normal there and not something to escalate reflexively. Teaches the actual verification method for engineers who do have access: log into the server and read the queue contents directly to confirm whether messages are genuine business mail or spam, and if genuine, no action is needed even though the count keeps climbing -- but recommends watching the trend for at least 20-30 minutes before concluding it's benign, since a queue that keeps climbing without leveling off is the actual red flag. References a real recent incident as a contrast case: spam sent through one relay mail ID caused a relay server's queue to spike to ~2000+ messages overnight, which was NOT normal and required immediate escalation -- explicitly reasoning that queue growth can't just be assumed harmless, because if it actually is spam, the sending IP risks getting blocklisted by receiving mail providers, which is the real business risk driving the urgency to verify rather than wait.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to TetraWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
TetraWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)