Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
TetraWiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Tornedo.tetrain.com Upgrade Plan
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== 3.3 Update (2026-07-23, later same day) — patched to latest 7.9 via Vault, still Phase A == Client ran a <code><nowiki>yum update</nowiki></code> pulling latest CentOS 7.9 packages from the Vault archive (the only source left now that CentOS 7's regular mirrors are gone). Rechecked via discovery + direct SSH: * '''Still CentOS Linux 7''' — this was a point-release patch update, not a leapp hop. Kernel/ distro major version unchanged. This is good, necessary Phase A prep (matches "fully patch current release first"), not progress on the 7→Stream8→Stream9→Stream10 chain itself. * '''Reboot now required, not yet done''': <code><nowiki>needs-restarting -r</nowiki></code> confirms glibc, systemd, openssl-libs, linux-firmware, and a new kernel (3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7) were all installed by the patch update but are not yet active — the box is still running the old 3.10.0-1127.13.1.el7 kernel/libraries in memory. This reboot is smaller/lower-risk than a leapp-hop reboot, but it's still real (brief) downtime for IPA's services and should be done deliberately, not as a surprise — holding for explicit go-ahead (see chat). * '''Duplicate-RPM problem NOT resolved''': <code><nowiki>package-cleanup --dupes</nowiki></code> still shows ~497 lines of output. The patch update added new package versions without cleaning up the old ones — this is expected (that's what <code><nowiki>--cleandupes</nowiki></code> is for) but confirms the cleanup step is still required before <code><nowiki>leapp preupgrade</nowiki></code> will have a clean baseline. * '''IPA health check — all green''': <code><nowiki>ipactl status</nowiki></code> shows every service RUNNING (Directory Service, krb5kdc, kadmin, httpd, ipa-custodia, ntpd, pki-tomcatd, ipa-otpd). All 9 certmonger-tracked certs show <code><nowiki>status: MONITORING</nowiki></code> with healthy future expiries, no <code><nowiki>ca-error</nowiki></code> on any of them. The identity service itself is currently in good shape. '''Reboot completed.''' Verified post-reboot: running kernel is now <code><nowiki>3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7</nowiki></code> (matches installed), <code><nowiki>needs-restarting -r</nowiki></code> clean, all IPA services RUNNING, all 9 certs still healthy. This closes out the "fully patch current release" prep step. '''<code><nowiki>ipa-backup</nowiki></code> completed''' (client ran it directly): full backup + logs at <code><nowiki>/var/lib/ipa/backup/ipa-full-2026-07-23-10-25-40</nowiki></code> on the box, 81M. Verified post-backup: all IPA services RUNNING again, all 9 certs still <code><nowiki>MONITORING</nowiki></code> with no errors. This item is closed. Duplicate-RPM cleanup (<code><nowiki>package-cleanup --cleandupes</nowiki></code>) is the next open item before <code><nowiki>leapp preupgrade</nowiki></code> — client is running this step themselves; guidance given in chat (review the transaction list before confirming, watch for grub2/dracut/kernel entries, re-verify <code><nowiki>--dupes</nowiki></code>/<code><nowiki>yum check</nowiki></code>/<code><nowiki>ipactl status</nowiki></code>/<code><nowiki>getcert list</nowiki></code> afterward).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to TetraWiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
TetraWiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)